Author(s)

T. Booth, M. E. Bastin, L. Penke, S. M. Maniega, C. Murray, N. A. Royle, A. J. Gow, J. Corley, R. D. Henderson, C. Hernandez Mdel, J. M. Starr, J. M. Wardlaw, I. J. Deary

ISBN

1931-1559 (Electronic)0894-4105 (Linking)

Publication year

2013

Periodical

Neuropsychology

Periodical Number

5

Volume

27

Pages

595-607

Author Address

Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology, University of Edinburgh.

Full version

OBJECTIVE: The present study investigates associations between brain white matter tract integrity and cognitive abilities in community-dwelling older people (N = 655). We explored two potential confounds of white matter tract-cognition associations in later life: (a) whether the associations between tracts and specific cognitive abilities are accounted for by general cognitive ability (g); and (b) how the presence of atrophy and white matter lesions affect these associations. METHOD: Tract integrity was determined using quantitative diffusion magnetic resonance imaging tractography (tract-averaged fractional anisotropy [FA]). Using confirmatory factor analysis, we compared first-order and bifactor models to investigate whether specific tract-ability associations were accounted for by g. RESULTS: Significant associations were found between g and FA in bilateral anterior thalamic radiations (r range: .16-.18, p < .01), uncinate (r range: .19-.26, p < .001), arcuate fasciculi (r range: .11-.12, p < .05), and the splenium of corpus callosum (r = .14, p < .01). After controlling for g within the bifactor model, some significant specific cognitive domain associations remained. Results also suggest that the primary effects of controlling for whole brain integrity were on g associations, not specific abilities. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that g accounts for most of, but not all, the tract-cognition associations in the current data. When controlling for age-related overall brain structural changes, only minor attenuations of the tract-cognition associations were found, and these were primarily with g. In totality, the results highlight the importance of controlling for g when investigating associations between specific cognitive abilities and neuropsychology variables.